e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 446 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 216 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 62 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 50 JMIR Infodemiology
- 47 JMIR Formative Research
- 11 JMIR Dermatology
- 10 JMIR Research Protocols
- 9 JMIR Mental Health
- 7 JMIR Aging
- 6 JMIR Medical Education
- 6 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 4 JMIR Cancer
- 4 JMIR Diabetes
- 4 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 4 JMIRx Med
- 1 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 1 JMIR Nursing
- 1 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 1 JMIR Serious Games
- 1 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Infoveillance of COVID-19 Infections in Dentistry Using Platform X: Descriptive Study
Among the different social media platforms, X (previously known as Twitter) is one of the most popular forms used for health care communication [11].
In the field of medicine, platform X (formerly known as Twitter) has been used as a source of social media data within the context of health care–related information [11]. X allows millions of users to send and receive “tweets” or short messages for free.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e54650
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Twitter (now X), a hub for real-time public discourse, has become a fertile ground for divergent views on COVID-19 treatment [4,5]. This sentiment analysis focuses on Twitter discussions about ivermectin, showing public opinion that, while not devoid of misinformation risks, these discussions offer an alternative lens to understand the societal pulse on this contentious topic [6].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e50536
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Impact of Social Media Influencers on Amplifying Positive Public Health Messages
twitter
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e73062
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
At the time of data extraction, direct Twitter (subsequently rebranded as X) engagement with the paper yielded 165,720 tweets from 81,861 users with an upper bound of 11,094,945 followers, 181 media mentions, and a total altmetric score of 45,844. This investigative piece suggested that Pfizer vaccine trials were compromised by the unblinding of subjects and data falsification.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64679
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Profiling Generalized Anxiety Disorder on Social Networks: Content and Behavior Analysis
Vedula and Parthasarathy [19] studied the behaviors of people with depression on Twitter, whereas Peng et al [42] analyzed the depressive characteristics of Sina Weibo users based on posts and user profiles.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e53399
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Reference 8: Gender-related and geographic trends in interactions between radiotherapy professionals on Twitter Reference 9: Expanding opportunities for professional development: utilization of Twitter by early career Reference 10: Gender differences in Twitter use and influence among health policy and health servicestwitterGender Differences in X (Formerly Twitter) Use Among Oncology Physicians at National Cancer Institute–Designated
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66054
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
For example, Lwin et al [18] used Twitter data to explore global trends in the 4 emotions—fear, anger, sadness, and joy—alongside their relative salience, spanning from January 28 to April 9, 2020. Similarly, through mining large-scale Twitter data, Zhang et al [19] conducted a cross-sectional study on web-based public sentiments in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e54543
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
To supplement the shortage of clinical data and gain further insights into the development trends and variant tendencies of COVID-19, researchers have turned to social media, specifically Twitter (subsequently rebranded as X). Social media data offer unique advantages, such as rapid updates and a broad geographical reach, which traditional clinical data often lack [5,6].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e63190
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Approximately 30% of cancer-related social media posts on Facebook, Reddit, Pinterest, and X (previously known as Twitter) contain misinformation, and a staggering 77% of these posts have the potential to encourage patients to pursue futile and toxic therapies, resulting in physical, psychological, and logistical burdens [7]. Cancer misinformation persists across various cancer types and is more pervasive in more prevalent cancers.
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e62703
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A study on Twitter examined how users with different ideological views and follower bases expressed vaccine favorability and specific vaccine-related concerns. Users’ perception of the vaccine was classified by a fine-tuned BERT model using training data that were coded by the authors.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e63824
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS